DI CCD SCANNER CABLE FOR CANON G1000,G2000,G3000,G4000,G3010,G2010,G4010

Login to View Price (Incl. GST)
dislable

It seems like you're looking for a specific type of cable for Canon printers and scanners, particularly for models like the Canon G1000, G2000, G3000, G4000, G3010, G2010, and G4010. Based on your query, you might be referring to the DI CCD scanner cable, which could be used to connect the scanner component of these models.

Product ID:
Categories :

It seems like you're looking for a specific type of cable for Canon printers and scanners, particularly for models like the Canon G1000, G2000, G3000, G4000, G3010, G2010, and G4010. Based on your query, you might be referring to the DI CCD scanner cable, which could be used to connect the scanner component of these models.

However, it's important to note that Canon printers like the ones you mentioned typically use standard USB or network cables to connect the printer to your computer or network. The term "DI CCD scanner cable" seems a bit unclear in this context, as these models don’t typically use a specific "scanner cable" beyond the regular USB cable for data transmission or connection.

Solutions:

  1. USB Cable: Canon G1000, G2000, G3000, G4000, and similar models often use a standard USB 2.0 cable for communication between the printer/scanner and the computer.
  2. Network Cables (for models with wireless printing): If the printer is connected over a network, an Ethernet cable or Wi-Fi connection could also be used.

If you're referring to a cable for the internal scanner connection (such as for repairs), it might be more specific to the device and harder to find on the open market. In this case, contacting Canon support or a professional repair service might be your best option for a replacement part.

Would you like assistance finding a compatible USB or other relevant cables for these models?

Add A Review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

Your Rating *

You need to Login OR Register

Overall Ratting:- 0

Based on 0 Comments